Post-Production Costs in PA: Fight!

Mineral owners and companies are having a little dustup over post-production costs up in PA.  Over the last couple of days, Bradford County has passed a resolution asking that all production be stopped on wells where the mineral owners are receiving little to no royalties, and hired a firm to put together a video on the subject.

Since it’s not West Virginia, and we’re pretty strapped for time right now (check the date of the last blog post), we haven’t been discussing it.  However, Marcellus Drilling News has been reporting about it pretty thoroughly.  It’s a subject that doesn’t get much attention in West Virginia, but should.  There are plenty of mineral owners here who are getting post-production costs removed from their royalty checks.  Most of them shouldn’t.  Here’s the link to the most recent MDN article about the battle in PA.

Methanol Plants for West Virginia

This is excellent news for West Virginia.  A California based company, US Methanol, is in the process of dismantling some existing methanol plants overseas and installing them in the Kanawha River Valley.

The plants take natural gas and convert it to methanol which is used for a host of things.  Wikipedia is a good place to start if you want to get into those details.

We’ve been hoping for a cracker plant for West Virginia for a long time, mainly because it would be good for the West Virginia economy.  Right now, pretty much all of the natural gas produced here is shipped out of the state as a raw product.  Shipping a finished product would certainly be better, as would having the additional jobs.  These plants, while not as large as a cracker plant, would provide a more finished product and some jobs.  The nice thing is, they can be built in 12-14 months.  A cracker plant takes several years to build, after several years of planning.

Right now there are two methanol plants that are definitely being built, but US Methanol seems to be thinking of building more.

While this is good news for West Virginia residents, it’s also good for West Virginia royalty rights owners.  The increased use of natural gas here in the state will drive up demand, and consequently drive up royalty payments.

The State of Oil and Gas: August 2016

One wild card in the oil prices card deck is Libya.  That country has had civil war since it deposed Gaddafi (how many ways are there to spell his name in English?) in 2010.  Production of oil dropped from about 1.6 million bpd to about 300,000 bpd today, with a low of 80,000 at one point.  If they can get their act together, they might be able to get back to 1.6 million or more.  There are signs that the two sides are reconciling, but it’s impossible to predict.  They’ll have some rebuilding to do, too.  This article gets into the subject a little more.

The Cleveland Federal Reserve says that natural gas production has evened out, but isn’t growing.  This is from the Beige Book, which is not based on statistics, but anecdotal accounts, so make of it what you will.  It’s definitely not forward looking, but is a good overview of what has happened recently.

There has been talk about building cracker plants in the Ohio River Valley for years.  Now talk is starting to pick up about some infrastructure that would support those plants, a storage and pipeline complex that would stretch hundreds of miles along the Ohio River Valley from Monaca, PA to Catlettsburg, KY with a spur running from Charleston, WV following the Kanawha River to the Ohio River.  Dubbed the Appalachian Storage Hub, it would hold 110 million barrels of liquid ethane.

There are two big suppliers for oil and gas drillers, Halliburton and Schlumberger.  Both are confident that drilling is picking up.

Consol Energy is re-starting its drilling program.  Unfortunately for our clients, it’s going to be in Ohio and Pennsylvania only.  As we still have an abundance of gas I think it’s unlikely that Consol will begin drilling or even taking leases in West Virginia in the near future.  We’ll have to see gas prices hit $3.50/MCF consistently before that happens, I believe.

Speaking of gas prices, today is July 27, 2016, and prices have been slowly sliding down from a high of about $3.00/MCF a couple weeks ago. This is in spite of hot weather increasing demand for natural gas for power generation.  The decrease in price would have to be because we still have a lot more gas in storage than we have had in the recent past, and with the increase in gas prices a few drilling rigs have been brought back online.  Production numbers are dropping off, but not quickly.  We won’t hit storage capacity at the end of storage season like some people were predicting this spring, but we will still have record amounts of gas in storage.

Bloomberg.com says that the fracklog (total number of drilled but not fracked wells) is beginning to shrink.  The article only treats oil plays, but the same thing holds true for gas plays.  Drilling has slowed, and fracking old wells can be quite a bit cheaper that drilling new ones, so it makes sense to do that first when gas prices start to climb.

Marketwatch.com says that falling oil prices are due more to a strengthening dollar than to any fundamental changes in supply and demand.  Long story short, oil is bought and sold with US dollars.  When the dollar goes up in value (strengthens) you need more Saudi Arabian riyals to buy the same barrel of oil.  If buyers don’t have more riyals to give for the same barrel of oil, the price of that barrel of oil has to go down.  Lately the US dollar has been strong, so the price of oil has been dropping.  This kind of thing doesn’t affect natural gas prices right now because natural gas is mostly a national commodity.  As we export more and more LNG we may begin to see the strength of the dollar begin to affect LNG prices, too.

Here’s an argument from nakedcapitalism.com that says we’re likely to drop to $36/bbl again pretty soon.  The long and short of it is that once prices hit $50/bbl for a little while investment money started to flow to developers, and developers started drilling, and drilling increased oil supply, and since we have tons of oil in storage already the little bit of extra supply decreased the value of oil.  Pretty sensible, really.

This Reuters article goes into a lot of what I’ve been thinking regarding what’s going to happen when oil and gas prices start to really recover.  The only thing it doesn’t touch on is whether banks and investors will be willing to put money into oil and gas right away.  I won’t summarize the article because there’s not much fluff.  Take a few minutes to read it.  It’s well worth it.

July 29, 2016:  So, this time of year refineries are shutting down for scheduled maintenance.  That means we won’t be using about 1.2 million barrels of oil per day for a while.  Since it’s scheduled, maybe the markets have planned for it and it won’t affect the price of a barrel of oil.  Maybe it will.  It will be interesting to see.

An article from NGI (subscription required) says that a lot of previous oilfield workers are not coming back to work in the “patch”.  They got burned last time, and don’t plan on getting burned again.  Can’t say that I blame them.  The market is improving, but there is no promise of a boom this next time around.  In fact, horizontal fracking may make it so that there is never another boom.  Interestingly, the lack of skilled workers could bring about another boom, as companies need skilled workers to produce, and if there’s not enough skilled workers we could end up with a lack of product, which will result in a high price.

Forbes has an excellent article which points out that oil has been overpriced for most of this year.  I was constantly surprised, pleasantly surprised, but surprised nonetheless, as I watched oil prices rise like they did.  when they hit $50/bbl and stayed close to it for a while I figured a lot of people knew something I didn’t.  I knew that production numbers had dropped off, and figured that that must have been the reason prices were climbing.  Now that oil prices are dropping again I think maybe I was smarter than I realized.  That’s always a nice thought, even if it’s after the fact.  Now I am of the opinion that speculators drove the price up, and they’re driving it back down.  There was never a good fundamental reason for the price of oil to be or stay up.  We have a surplus of over 3 billion barrels (maybe quite a bit more unreported).  While production has dropped off, we would have to see ridiculous drops in production to really chew up a significant amount of that 3 billion barrels.

Here’s an interesting experimental technique for fracking rock that’s worth looking at.  Hard to say if it will be better than hydraulic fracturing, but it will be interesting to follow.

August 5, 2016: gas prices are still hovering around $2.70-$2.80/MCF.  This is in spite of a drawdown on natural gas reserves instead of an increase in storage reserves.  We took 6 billion cubic feet out of storage last week, and prices still aren’t going up much.  This article says it’s probably because we’re coming to the end of the summer, and speculators, er, investors are staring down the barrel at the end of September, all of October, and part of November when demand for natural gas will naturally be going down.  Can’t say as I can disagree with ’em.

An article over at kallanishenergy.com says that drilling is going to pick up again in early 2017.  The demand for the gas is there, as DUCs (drilled but uncompleted wells) are diminishing, down from 2600 in October 2015 to 1500 in May of 2016.  The only thing to do when DUCs run out is to drill new wells.  Makes sense.

Over the last few days people have been listening as OPEC talks about possibly cutting production.  Oil prices have gone up just a bit because of it.  People are just nuts.  It makes no sense for OPEC to cut production.  If they do, they will lose market share (clients, sales, long-term contracts) to American companies.  We can ramp up production very quickly and absorb small, short-term demand.  Large, long-term demand might be a little harder, but not much harder.  Saudi Arabia will not cut production because if they do they will lose customers.  Iran is still increasing production, Venezuela would love to sell oil for a higher price and will do so any chance it gets, if Libya gets its act together they could bring another million barrels per day online in a year or so, American producers can drill wells and have them online within a few months.  It’s rather like Whack-A-Mole.  One place stops producing, another will pop up with additional production.  Don’t forget about the 3 billion (yes, billion with a B) barrels of crude oil that are in storage around the globe.  Even if worldwide production stopped completely it would take us an entire month to use up all the crude that’s in storage.  It just doesn’t make sense for Saudi Arabia to cut production, so OPEC won’t be able to come to an agreement.  I suppose that a very short-term cut in production, something less than three months, might be beneficial as it would cut into the global storage numbers some.  Longer than that and American companies will be bringing new production online.  It doesn’t make sense for OPEC to cut production.

It’s August 15, 2016 and oil prices finally dropped again.  The recent increase in oil prices was ridiculous and founded in speculation that OPEC was going to freeze oil production.  Such speculation was completely driven by speculators, people who make money on rumors.  Since it was OPEC saying they might agree to a freeze, I wouldn’t be surprised if some people in charge at OPEC made a lot of money playing the futures market.

Atlantic Coast Pipeline: Schedule

A couple days ago the FERC issued a notice that the final Environmental Impact Statement for the Atlantic Coast Pipeline would be finished on June 30, 2017.  After the EIS is available, there is a 90 day decision deadline, basically an opportunity for other federal agencies to weigh in on the EIS.  So on September 28, 2017, the EIS is expected to be approved.

The ACP will not be able to begin construction before that date.  When, exactly, it will begin construction is unknown.  Dominion had previously hoped to begin construction in the summer of 2017, but unless you consider the end of September to be the summer that looks pretty unlikely.

Implied Right to Pool Called into Question

Professor Joshua Fershee who teaches at the West Virginia University College of Law has made a statement regarding the decision (.pdf) by Judge Hummel that all leases include the right to pool.

Professor Fershee didn’t go so far as to say the decision was wrong, but he did criticize some of the reasoning of the decision, including what he thought the decision left out.

Fershee believes that if the decision were reviewed by a higher court, it would probably be sent back to the lower court for some explanation.

I am of the opinion that older leases that were signed before pooling became a thing couldn’t possibly have included the right to pool.  It wasn’t in the contemplation of the parties.

It will be interesting to see how this one plays out in court.  No one appealed the decision, and the time for appeal has long since passed, so it won’t be appealed.  However, someone is going to have a fight over this issue in the future, and someone will appeal the issue to the Supreme Court.

Rover Pipeline and the Environment

OK, that headline is a big subject, and the actual subject of this post is much, much smaller.  A better headline for this story would be extremely long and pretty much cover the entire story.

The FERC has filed its final environmental impact study for the Rover pipeline.  It’s a mere 481 pages, and, just like every other government document, riveting reading in every way.

I enjoy reading technical legalese as much as the next guy, but the FERC has provided a handy summary of its recommendations so I don’t have an excuse to snuggle up with a blanket and some hot chocolate. There are also links on that page to .pdfs of the entire report and particular sections of it if you really want to dig into the details.  Just a little light summer reading, right?  Enjoy!

Why Your Royalties are Low Right Now

There are actually a couple of reasons why your royalty checks are pretty small (relative to a couple years ago) right now.  First, production from wells always decreases over time, second, the price of gas is down, third, the producer is probably taking post-production costs out of your check, and fourth, the producer is probably throttling back production from the well.

Side Note: if you think your producer is taking out post-production costs you should call the office and talk with us about it.  We can probably force them to stop.

We’re going to focus on the second reason in this post, the price of gas.  Prices are down for a couple of reasons.  One is that there’s just way more gas available across the nation than there ever has been.  A second reason is that the gas here in the Appalachian basin is…..stuck.  It’s backed up.  It’s constrained.  Whatever you want to say, there’s just not enough transportation capacity for it all.

Because there’s not enough transportation capacity, you aren’t getting paid top dollar for the gas coming out of your property.

It’s not just that we can’t transport all the Appalachian basin gas to someone who will buy it, either.

The price of gas is set at the Henry Hub in Louisiana.  The Henry Hub is a place where a bunch of pipelines come together and there’s a bunch of storage.  Whatever gas is selling for at the Henry Hub is the benchmark price for gas in the United States.  It changes constantly based on a huge number of factors.

Here in the Appalachian basin there are a couple of local hubs.  Prices for gas are set at these hubs.  They are based on the Henry Hub price, and then changed either up or down depending on local market conditions.  Once upon a time we could sell gas for more than Henry Hub prices.  It hasn’t been that way in a long time.

Because we’re producing so much gas we don’t have enough space for it all in the local hubs and other pipelines in the area.  Because of that, gas sells at a discount to the Henry Hub price.

So not only can we not get all our gas into a pipeline in the first place, we also can’t get full price for it.

And that is one of the reasons why royalty checks have been relatively small lately.

Is there any hope for the future?  Well, RBN Energy is doing a two-part series on pipeline buildout in the Appalachian basin.  Here’s the first part, and the second part will be coming in the near future.

On top of getting a better price for our gas compared to the Henry Hub, we also need to start shipping gas out of the country for foreign markets to buy.  Right now, 99% of the gas produced in the United States is consumed in the United States.  That is changing rapidly, with the Sabine Pass LNG plant shipping its first cargo of LNG back in February of 2016, and with other plants coming online in the next couple of years.  Once natural gas has become a world commodity we should be able to sell at a better price than we can get right now.

Upper Devonian Drilling

Upper Devonian

EQT has announced that it will start drilling Upper Devonian formations along with the Marcellus shale.  This is a great move, and while I don’t like EQTs stance on post-production costs or know anybody that really likes working with them, I have to applaud it.  Here’s why.

The Upper Devonian lies just a few hundred feet above the Marcellus shale.  It produces gas, sometimes wet gas that is rich in ethane, propane, butane and the like.  It doesn’t produce as much gas as the Marcellus, though, so a lot of companies have ignored it.

If memory serves, you can improve production from any acre by about 50% if you can produce from both the Marcellus and the Upper Devonian.

However, if you develop the Marcellus without developing the Upper Devonian formations you are unlikely to be able to develop the Upper Devonian.  This is because the fractures you make in the Marcellus migrate upwards for hundreds of feet, right up to the Upper Devonian formations.  When you go back later to fracture the Upper Devonian you lose a lot of, if not all of, your fracking pressure into the existing fractures.

In order to take advantage of the Upper Devonian formations you have to frack them at the same time you do the Marcellus formations.

Anybody out there negotiating their own lease should ask the company whether they are planning to develop the Upper Devonian, and find out why they are not.  They may have good reasons, such as it simply won’t produce much gas in your area.

You probably won’t be able to convince them to change their plans unless you control all of hundreds of acres, but you could always tell them you won’t sign a lease unless there’s something in there saying they will develop the Devonian with the Marcellus.  It’s worth a shot.

 

Cracker Plant on the Gulf Coast

So Exxon and SABIC are thinking about building a cracker plant on the Gulf Coast in Texas or Louisiana.  That’s good, since that cracker plant will use gas that will come, at least in part, from the Marcellus/Utica area.  It’s frustrating as a West Virginian (transplanted, sure, but this is my home) to see plans for a cracker plant clear down there when we can’t get one built here.  It would be great for the State, and great for my clients, but pretty much all we’ve heard about it is bad news.  Lately we haven’t even heard bad news.  It makes one think that it’s just not going to happen.  I sure hope that’s not the case.  West Virginia will once again miss out on a great opportunity to put it’s natural resources to good use.