Marcellus and Utica Producers are Still Making Money

With gas and oil prices down, it’s been a lot harder to make money in the oil patch.  The one good thing about this situation is that producers have had to figure out how to cut costs.  Producers have convinced suppliers to lower their prices, drillers have figured out new tecDollar Signhniques, leasing has slowed down, lease prices have dropped, and people have been fired.

Most of the cost cutting measures end up in people getting fired.  We hate to see people get fired.  We’ve been there ourselves more than once.

The only good thing about it is that companies are now profitable at a much lower price point than they were a year ago.  They’re still in business, still employing people, and still paying out royalties.

Mark Passwaters over at snl.com (not the comedy show) thinks that most producers are capable of turning a comfortable profit with oil at $75/bbl.

While that is interesting in general for West Virginia mineral and royalty owners, the most interesting part of the article says that Utica and Marcellus producers are doing just fine at $3.00/MCF gas.

Why is that?  The success mantra for developers in the Marcellus has been “keep costs low”.  I’ve heard that from more than one small developer, and it’s true for the mid-majors like Antero and Southwestern, too.  They’ve been on the cutting edge of science in the shales from the beginnin

Oil and Gas Leases Could Last Forever

Autica-shale-stratigraphy-smnyone who has had a lease reviewed by us in the last few years will know that there are multiple producible formations underneath the property they have leased. This is excellent for royalty owners, as the more formations can be produced the more gas can be produced. There’s just one problem with that. It means that the lease that you sign today could possibly be in existence decades, or even centuries from now.

Ignoring the happy fact that the lease will be in effect because the producer will be paying you royalties, let’s look at what the implications of a decades-old lease are. The easiest way is to look into history.

In 1892 a farmer (no names will be used here so as to preserve my clients’ confidentiality) signed a lease on property here in West Virginia. The producer was diligent, and drilled a well on the property within a few months. The well produced gas, which was something of a disappointment because everyone was looking for oil at the time. They didn’t shut the well in though because the producer allowed the farmer to run a pipe to the house and use the gas for heating and cooking.

Over the years gas became a valuable commodity, and the developer put a line of his own to the well and started selling the gas. Of course, the producer paid royalties to the farmer, and all was well. Eventually though, the well produced less and less gas.

Let’s fast forward to today, and that well that was drilled in the late 1800s is still producing in 2015. The production has dropped off to a few hundred MCFs per year. The royalties paid are only a few dollars each year, but it’s just enough production to keep the lease alive.

Now let’s back up to 2007, when the Marcellus boom was just taking off. The current producer of the well was just a small time mom and pop operation. They didn’t have enough money to drill a Marcellus shale horizontal well on their own. They were approached by a big producer who wanted to buy the rights to produce gas from the Marcellus, and the mom and pop jumped at the chance to make some good money from the old lease. They assigned the rights to the Marcellus shale over to the big company for thousands of dollars an acre.

Along with the rights to develop the Marcellus shale came the rights to use the surface in any way that was “fairly necessary”. The big company approached the current owner of the farm. The big company said they wanted to put in a well pad, an access road, and a pipeline. The well pad was going to take up about 10 acres of mostly flat land (flat land is hard to come by in most parts of West Virginia), the access road would be 1/2 mile over property the farmer hunted on, and the pipeline was going to be across other property the farmer owned. All told, the development was going to take up about 15 acres of the farm.

The farmer said no. The big company said, “we have the right to do this because we have this lease that was signed back in 1892, and that lease gives us the right to use the surface in any way that is fairly necessary for the development of oil and gas.” The farmer said, “I don’t see that in there.” The company said, “no, but the courts have said that any lease gives the company that right.” The farmer consulted with a lawyer, who told him the big company was right, but that there were some legal arguments to make and he could take the big company to court, but it would cost $10,000.

Back in 1892 when the first farmer signed the lease, he didn’t expect a well pad, road, and pipeline to take up 15 acres of his good farmland. A well pad took up maybe an acre, and the access road was usually nothing more than a jeep trail.  The pipeline was usually just a couple inches in diameter, and was sometimes laid on the surface over rough ground. He had no way of foreseeing the size and extent of modern well sites. If he could have seen into the future, he probably would have made some changes to the lease before he signed it.

That’s just one example of how a lease surviving for decades could be detrimental to those who inherit it, or those who inherit the property affected by it.

It’s impossible to foresee every possible way that a lease could affect people in the future. You can’t protect your heirs from everything. It is possible, however, to do the best that you can with the information that is out there now.

Multiple formations mean that oil and gas companies could produce one formation until it is exhausted, then a second formation until it is exhausted, and then a third and maybe even a fourth. It’s impossible to tell for sure how many producible formations are down there.  It’s impossible to tell how long the lease will stay alive.

The reason we’re pointing this out right now is that Rex Energy has completed wells to the Marcellus and the Upper Devonian on the same property in Pennsylvania. The Marcellus produced reasonably well, but the Upper Devonian actually produced a little better.  It’s been questionable up until now whether the Upper Devonian would be a good formation to explore.  That question is now laid to rest, at least to some extent.  Wet-Dry_Line_with_Depth

For our West Virginia mineral owners, keep an eye out for leases that include the Upper Devonian.  We can look forward to increased exploration in the usual counties; Tyler, Wetzel, Marshall, Doddridge, Harrison, Ritchie.  There may be a renewed interest in Barbour, Upshur, Taylor, and some of the other counties in the Marcellus dry gas area.  We hope so, as we have clients who are waiting on leases in those counties.

For everyone that’s thinking about signing a lease — do try to think about the future as much as you can.  If you need some help, give us a call.

Magnum Hunter Sells Tyler County, WV Leases

Dollar SignNow this is news.  Magnum Hunter will close tomorrow on a deal to sell 5,210 acres of leases in Tyler County.  Magnum says the leases are in “non-core undeveloped and unproven” parts of the county.  The sale should net Magnum $40.8 million dollars.  That’s $7,831.09 per acre, by our calculator.  For non-core, undeveloped, and unproven leases.  Oh, and the Chairman of the Board, Gary C. Evans, also pointed out that a large portion of the acreage had expirations on the horizon.  So Magnum sold leases that are expiring soon and in questionable parts of Tyler County for almost $8,000 an acre.

Just speculating, but the only company that could possibly drill on soon-to-expire leases in Tyler County is Antero Resources.  They have the rigs in place and the most infrastructure of anyone up there right now.  We could be wrong about that, of course.  JayBee, Statoil, EQT, and Noble are all working hard in that neck of the woods, too.

But that’s beside the point.  We’d like to point out that the sale was for almost $8,000 per acre for, shall we say, sub-prime leases.  West Virginians continue to sell themselves short regarding what they’ll take for lease bonuses.  Ask for more than you think you can get.  Always ask for more than you think you can get.  You might be pleasantly surprised at what happens.

The Upper Devonian Formations

Burket Formation

Clients of Nuttall Legal have long known about the Upper Devonian formation, also known as the Burket formation here in West Virginia.  It’s shallower than the Marcellus, and not terribly thick, but has good potential to produce natural gas.  Gas and Oil Mag has an article on the Upper Devonian formation that should be interesting to anyone thinking of signing an oil and gas lease.

The important point to remember is that the Marcellus and the Utica are not the only producible formations down there.  The Upper Devonian is probably not the last of the formations, either.  As technologies change and the price of gas increases with demand, formations that were previously uninteresting will become financially feasible.  The lease that you sign today could be in effect for generations as the original formation is developed and runs low, only to be replaced by a well to another formation.  You have to think to the future as much as you possibly can when negotiating an oil and gas lease.

A Pugh Clause, or How to Get Your Property Back

DocumentFor most of my clients, getting a Pugh (pronounced “pew”) clause in their lease is going to be tough, but worth it.  It’s tough because oil and gas companies don’t like to give Pugh clauses to people who have a tiny net mineral interest in a large tract.  It’s worth it because a Pugh clause makes it so you can regain control of your mineral rights.

A Pugh clause comes into effect at the end of the primary term of the lease.  On that date, any portion of the property that is not actually producing oil or gas will drop out of the lease.  Here is why that’s important.

Every oil and gas lease has a primary term.  Most leases taken in West Virginia of late have had five year primary terms.  The primary term is the period of time during which the oil and gas company can explore, drill, and perform work to achieve production of the oil and gas.  At the end of the primary term, if there’s no production, there’s no lease.  If there is production, the lease continues.

Every oil and gas lease also has language in it that says if part of the leased property is producing oil or gas, then all of the leased property will stay leased.  In the industry, we say that it’s “held by production” or HBP for short.

Every modern oil and gas lease gives the company the right to combine the leased tract with other leased tracts to form a drilling unit or a pool.  (While there’s a difference between units and pools, it’s not necessary for understanding a Pugh clause.)  That unit or pool can include all or just a part of the leased tract.  Only the part of the leased tract that is in the unit or pool is going to have royalties paid on it, as only that part of the leased tract is considered to be producing gas.  Any little part of the tract could be included, down to one square inch, and it would still keep the lease alive on the entire tract.

A Marcellus Shale Drilling Unit in Doddridge County, WV.

A Marcellus Shale Drilling Unit in Doddridge County, WV.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I’ve posted a picture of a real drilling unit above, one that’s been filed at the Doddridge County courthouse and is actually producing gas today.  I’ve redacted any identifying information, except for Antero Resources, since they want people to get in touch with them.  Notice Tract B in the upper left hand corner.  Only a portion of that tract is included in the drilling unit.  Only that portion of the tract is going to have royalties paid from the drilling unit.  The rest of Tract B will be held by production for as long at the unit is producing oil or gas.

In real life Antero is going to be putting the rest of Tract B into another unit that is right next to this one.  However, if things don’t go according to Antero’s plan, it’s quite possible that the rest of Tract B could have a lease on it for decades without producing gas, and consequently, not producing royalties or any payments of any sort.  That’s neither fair nor right.

That’s where a Pugh clause comes into play.  A typical Pugh clause will say that any acreage that’s not producing at the end of the primary term will drop out of the lease.  When the primary term is up, the mineral owner will get the right to lease the property again, hopefully with a better bonus and a better royalty amount.  The mineral owner won’t have to sit around wondering whether the company is going to develop the minerals or not.

There’s one more point that needs to be made.  A Pugh clause can also state that any formations which are not producing will drop out of the lease.  This is extremely important in West Virginia as there are multiple shale formations with the potential to produce oil or gas under most of the acreage that is being leased today.  Most people know about the Marcellus Shale and the Utica Shale.  There is also the Barnett Shale, which is a little shallower than the Marcellus Shale.  There are other Upper Devonian formations (the Marcellus and the Barnett are both Upper Devonian formations) which could potentially produce gas or oil. There is also the Point Pleasant formation, which is directly below the Utica Shale.  In the western part of the state there is the Rodgersville Shale, the Berea sandstone, and the Trenton-Black River which are currently being explored.  There is also some work being done to explore traditional shallow oil formations for possible oil production using new techniques.  At this point, we simply can’t say how many formations are down there that could produce oil or gas.  So it’s important to get a Pugh clause that says formations drop out, too.

For the large majority of my clients, it’s going to be difficult to get a Pugh clause because they own such a small portion of the minerals.  Most oil and gas companies are not going to give up the rights to a small portion of the tract at the end of the primary term for one person when everyone else has agreed to a lease without a Pugh clause in it.  The companies will give a Pugh clause if they get desperate, though.  Sometimes it’s worth it to push the issue.  Of course, you have to balance the importance of a Pugh clause with other considerations as well.

In short, get a Pugh clause if you can, and make sure that it affects both acreage and formations.

If you find yourself in negotiations and think or feel that you need help, give my office a call.  It’s what we do.

 

Lessee Doesn’t Have to Negotiate for Extension of Lease (when it’s Already in the Lease)

DocumentI haven’t read the background to this case, but I’m willing to bet that I know what happened.  I expect that the landowner signed a lease with Chesapeake and found out after the fact that they could have gotten a much better deal.  Fast forward a few years and Chesapeake decided to exercise the right to extend the lease.  Knowing that there was better money out there for a new lease, the landowner decided to fight the automatic extension.

The landowner tried to argue that the wording of the extension clause required Chesapeake to negotiate a new lease.  Chesapeake disagreed, and they ended up in court.  The court found the landowner’s argument to be not persuasive, as well it should.  I don’t side with the companies, and I think the automatic extension only works in the company’s favor, but when you have signed your name to an agreement you abide by that agreement.  If you didn’t read it and understand it, that’s your own fault.

The moral of this story is that you should read every part of your lease, understand every part of your lease, and find competent counsel to explain the parts you don’t understand.  Then you need to negotiate for a better lease.  You won’t get everything you want in negotiations (which is why you always ask for more than you think you can get) but you can make the lease better.  Once you’ve signed the lease, you have to live with it.

Efficiency Leads to Profits, and Should Lead to Higher Bonuses and Royalties

DocumentWell now, this is an interesting take on things.  It appears that oil and gas companies that are working in the shale formations are actually doing pretty well still, in spite of the decrease in energy prices.  This article from Bloomberg says that improvements in efficiency have probably made up for the decreases in prices.

The most interesting number that the article quotes, at least for my clients, is that Antero has costs of less $18/bbl of oil produced from Appalachia.  That’s pretty impressive.  It also means that they can afford to pay a bit more in bonus and royalty amounts.

When you’re negotiating your lease, make sure to ask for more than you think you can get.  In most cases, you will be pleasantly surprised.

What is Nuisance Oil?

Question MarkWhat is nuisance oil?  To be honest, I don’t know.  I don’t have any problem admitting that, because I don’t think anybody knows what nuisance oil is.

I just read an article about a landowner in Ohio who received a lease from XTO which said that the landowner would receive royalties on material removed from his property, except for “non-commercial nuisance oil”.

I have never heard the term “nuisance oil” before, so I decided to do a little research to figure out what it could be.  First I checked my law school text on oil and gas.  It doesn’t have the term “nuisance oil” in the index.  Next I checked my Oil and Gas Law in a Nutshell.  It also doesn’t have the term in the index.  (Full disclosure, both books are in their 6th edition, and I have the 4th edition.)

Legal tomes failing me, I checked Google.  The only reference to oil as a nuisance was referring to those folks who were drilling for salt water and drinking water in the area where “Colonel” Drake dug his first oil well.  Before he started developing oil, they would hit oil all the time, but they considered it a nuisance because there wasn’t any use for it.  That was in the 1850s.  My how times have changed.

Google having failed me, I checked Fastcase.  There were no results for West Virginia.  There were two results for all jurisdictions.  Both had to do with nuisances resulting from oil and gas development.  There was nothing that indicated that there is any type of oil coming out of the ground and into a producer’s pipe that is considered a nuisance to the producer.

Nuisance oil is not defined in XTOs lease, it’s not defined in oil and gas law, and it’s not defined by the oil and gas industry.  That means that it’s up to XTO to define what “nuisance oil” is.  I guarantee that XTO will define “nuisance oil” in a way that will increase profits to XTO.  That will, unquestionably, reduce profits to the landowner.

Lesson: read your lease before you sign it, and make sure you understand what it says.  This landowner did, and has saved himself a lot of money, if he can get XTO to agree to a reasonable lease.

Royalty and Bonus Amounts in West Virginia, 2015

Statoil is going to drill under the Ohio River.  It’s paying really good money to the State of West Virginia to do so.  The bonus equals $8,732 per acre, and the royalty is going to be 20%.  There is no indication as to whether that is gross or net, but 20% is still really good for West Virginia.  As usual, I encourage every mineral owner out there to negotiate for a higher bonus and higher royalty.  You’re not getting paid what you should be getting paid.

Check here for the write-up over at Marcellus Drilling News.

West Virginia Oil and Gas Leases are Like Cats

As the saying goes, “cats have nine lives”.  It seems that oil and gas leases can compete with cats in that department.  The Northern District of West Virginia ruled on a Tyler County case (.pdf) a few days ago, saying that a lease needs a forfeiture clause or it will continue to exist, even if the Lessee doesn’t keep up it’s end of the bargain.  Anyone trying to negotiate a West Virginia oil and gas lease for yourself should make sure the lease includes a forfeiture clause.

The case, Cunningham Energy v. Ridgetop Capital, involved two corporations, about 190 acres of land, and a lease that required development within a specific time frame.  The Lessee was supposed to drill two wells within two years and more wells if those were successful.  The Lessee filed permits and did some preliminary site work, but didn’t drill any wells within the two year limit.

The companies went to court over it, arguing a number of points.  The one that people should be most interested in is regarding breach of contract and forfeiture.  The Court held that the Lessee had breached the contract or, in other words, that the Lessee had not met the requirements of one or more terms of the lease.

Since the Lessee had breached the contract, the Lessor argued that the Lease should no longer be valid, and the Lessor should be free to enter in to a new lease with another company.

The Court disagreed.  It stated that a breach of contract in an oil and gas lease did not automatically forfeit the lease.  It stated that the usual remedy for a breach of any contract is money damages.  It stated that in order for the lease to be automatically forfeit, there would have to be a clause in the lease stating that forfeiture was the correct remedy, and doing so in some detail.

The Court went on to award damages in the amount of several million dollars, which represented the back royalty amounts that would have been paid, and which would have to be paid back if wells were drilled and royalties paid in the future.

This means when you, West Virginia mineral rights owners, are negotiating a lease, make sure there’s a forfeiture clause in your favor.  If not, understand that you will only be able to get money damages in a breach of contract situation.  I suspect either one will make most people happy.  It’s just a bit jarring to expect that you will be able to get rid of a bad Lessee when they mess up, and then have the Court tell you otherwise.