2017 Legislation: Force Pooling is Back

Forced Pooling is back, as everyone expected it to be.  However, the oil and gas companies have realized that they can’t get forced pooling to pass under the name of forced pooling here in West Virginia.  So they’re giving it two new names, “joint development” and “cotenancy”.  Both seem to be created in the same bill.

The new forced pooling bill is Senate Bill 244.  It will change Chapter 37 Article 7 Section 2 of the West Virginia code which deals with a legal concept called “waste”.

The existing paragraph is very short, and says simply that if a cotenant commits waste he’ll be liable to his other cotenants for damages.  The new section is much longer and focused precisely on oil and gas leases.

The new paragraph (b) will make it so that if a majority of the owners of a tract agree to a “lawful use” (a lease), the company will not have to enter into a lease with the other owners.  All the company will have to do is account to (pay) the other owners a proportionate share of the revenues and costs of the “lawful use”.

So when 50.01 percent of the owners agree to lease, the other 49.99 percent of owners will have no say in what kind of lease they enter in to.

Also, the only thing the company will have to do is pay royalties to the 49.99 percent.  But they can deduct post-production costs.  It won’t be more than a minute before that right gets abused.

The new paragraph (c) will give the company the right to use the surface of any tract overlying the “jointly developed leases”.  In other words, when tracts are pooled for development the company can use any of the surface without entering into a surface use agreement with the surface owner.

The stated intent of this legislation is to make it so the companies can pool both old and new existing leases which don’t have pooling language in them.  However, it does a lot more than that.

This is bad legislation for both mineral owners and surface owners.  It only benefits the companies, which will get into leases for far less money than they already do.  Don’t forget, the West Virginia Marcellus Shale is the most economic shale play (in 2013, but not much has changed relative to other plays) in the United States.  We’re already giving up our minerals for less than people in Pennsylvania and Ohio do.  Let’s not let the companies force us into even cheaper leases.

 

Drill Site Accident in Pennsylvania

Well, the unusual news just keeps coming.  Over the long weekend there was a fire on a drill site in Pennsylvania.  Rice Energy was fracking a well and a fire started in one of the frack trucks.   Four frack trucks were damaged along with six frack pumps.

A couple that lives less than 200 yards from the site (poor guys) said the explosion shook the house.  They had lots of neighbors calling to tell them to evacuate, and they did.

16 fire departments responded, most of them to provide water through their pumper trucks.

It’s just a reminder that even though (most) oil and gas companies go out of their way to make things safe, accidents still happen.  Make sure if you sign a lease or a surface use agreement that you consider what will happen if something catastrophic happens.  Think about how much light the drill rig will put off at night, how much noise the flaring operation will make, how much noise the daily operations will make, how much dust and noise all the trucks will bring, and how the operation might affect any unique aspects of your everyday life.

Really Old Wells and Horizontal Fracking

Bloomberg has an interesting article about old wells in Pennsylvania and how they can affect or be affected by a horizontally fracked well.

West Virginia has the same problem.

The first thing to know about old wells in West Virginia is that we don’t know where they all are.  West Virginia didn’t start assigning API numbers to wells until 1929, at least forty years after oil and gas development really boomed in West Virginia, and at least seventy years after the first oil wells were drilled.  That means there are a lot of well locations out there that are unknown.  How many?

A quick Google search turned up some great photos that can help us get an idea.  The following were taken from a web site about the Kanawha and West Virginia Railroad.  There are many more on other sites.

The photo below was taken in 1913 on Blue Creek in West Virginia.  You can plainly see at least six wells, and possibly another six or seven.  When you look at the larger photo it’s possible that some of what looks like oil derricks are actually just ageing or smudges on the photo.Blue Creek, WV Oil Wells

 

 

This photo of oil wells in West Virginia was taken at another location on Blue Creek, possibly about the same time as the one above.  There are clearly ten oil wells.Oil Derricks on Blue Creek near One Mile Fork

 

 

 

 

 

None of those wells would have had API numbers, and their locations were never recorded by anybody.  Nobody thought they would be important.  They are the kinds of wells that we are concerned with, and they exist all over West Virginia.

Many of these old wells were not properly plugged when they were abandoned.  Someone might have thrown old lumber or trees down the hole, filled it with dirt, and called it a day.  Others might have gotten a little better treatment with some cannon balls or scrap metal thrown in for good measure.  Very few were plugged with cement, and many were just left open.

This can be a real problem when a horizontal well is drilled nearby.  Some of the old wells were drilled down thousands of feet, a few even into the formations that we are fracking today.  When we frack, the pressure can push fluids into the old wells, either directly by way of the induced fractures or through existing faults in the rock.  It’s called well communication in the industry.

It could lead to contamination of a water well, or fracking fluids on the surface, or natural gas spewing into the air.  Nobody wants that.  Even the companies doing the fracking don’t want that as it lowers the amount of pressure in their well, leading to fewer, shorter, and smaller fractures and lower production.

So what can be done about it?  It’s hard to do much about it.  Many of these old wells don’t show above the surface, so getting eyes in the field isn’t going to help.  A metal detector will find a lot of them, but some of these old wells were lined with wood.  Even the wells the were lined with metal often had the casing pulled out for use on another well.  It’s a real problem, and there isn’t an obvious and good solution.

The reason we’re writing about it is to point out to people one way that their water wells can be contaminated with fracking fluid.  If you think you have a water well that’s been ruined by fracking you can get help.  It’s going to be an uphill battle proving that fracking did it, but it can be done.

Call the office at 304-473-1403 and find out what you can do.

 

Comment Time on the Atlantic Coast Pipeline

If anyone would like to comment to the FERC about the Atlantic Coast Pipeline, now is the time to do so.  My comments would focus on opposition to the use of eminent domain and on the safety concerns I have recently found.  Others are concerned about damage to the immediate environment around the pipeline and the trickle down effects on global warming.  Some few are concerned that we are overbuilding pipeline infrastructure.  Whatever your concern, now is the time to voice your opinion.

The link to use when filing your opinion is:

https://ferconline.ferc.gov/QuickComment.aspx

Good luck!  Regardless of the outcome lets be grateful we live in a place where we can at least voice an opinion.

West Virginia Nuisance Lawsuits Against Oil and Gas Producers

There seem to be more and more nuisance lawsuits filed in West Virginia these days.  Property owners who are affected by oil and gas development, but who aren’t benefiting from it in any way, are resorting to legal action to protect their property.

The big problem with nuisance lawsuits is that they usually don’t pay for themselves.  You can count on getting a judgment, but that judgment usually won’t even cover the cost of the attorney or law firm you hire.  You can protect your property, but it’s going to cost you.  A lot of surface owners in West Virginia simply don’t have the resources to take on that cost.  Lawyers won’t (usually) work for free.

That hasn’t stopped every West Virginian, though.  This article over at E&E Publishing covers the subject pretty well.  It’s worth a quick read.

 

Oil and Gas Leases Could Last Forever

Autica-shale-stratigraphy-smnyone who has had a lease reviewed by us in the last few years will know that there are multiple producible formations underneath the property they have leased. This is excellent for royalty owners, as the more formations can be produced the more gas can be produced. There’s just one problem with that. It means that the lease that you sign today could possibly be in existence decades, or even centuries from now.

Ignoring the happy fact that the lease will be in effect because the producer will be paying you royalties, let’s look at what the implications of a decades-old lease are. The easiest way is to look into history.

In 1892 a farmer (no names will be used here so as to preserve my clients’ confidentiality) signed a lease on property here in West Virginia. The producer was diligent, and drilled a well on the property within a few months. The well produced gas, which was something of a disappointment because everyone was looking for oil at the time. They didn’t shut the well in though because the producer allowed the farmer to run a pipe to the house and use the gas for heating and cooking.

Over the years gas became a valuable commodity, and the developer put a line of his own to the well and started selling the gas. Of course, the producer paid royalties to the farmer, and all was well. Eventually though, the well produced less and less gas.

Let’s fast forward to today, and that well that was drilled in the late 1800s is still producing in 2015. The production has dropped off to a few hundred MCFs per year. The royalties paid are only a few dollars each year, but it’s just enough production to keep the lease alive.

Now let’s back up to 2007, when the Marcellus boom was just taking off. The current producer of the well was just a small time mom and pop operation. They didn’t have enough money to drill a Marcellus shale horizontal well on their own. They were approached by a big producer who wanted to buy the rights to produce gas from the Marcellus, and the mom and pop jumped at the chance to make some good money from the old lease. They assigned the rights to the Marcellus shale over to the big company for thousands of dollars an acre.

Along with the rights to develop the Marcellus shale came the rights to use the surface in any way that was “fairly necessary”. The big company approached the current owner of the farm. The big company said they wanted to put in a well pad, an access road, and a pipeline. The well pad was going to take up about 10 acres of mostly flat land (flat land is hard to come by in most parts of West Virginia), the access road would be 1/2 mile over property the farmer hunted on, and the pipeline was going to be across other property the farmer owned. All told, the development was going to take up about 15 acres of the farm.

The farmer said no. The big company said, “we have the right to do this because we have this lease that was signed back in 1892, and that lease gives us the right to use the surface in any way that is fairly necessary for the development of oil and gas.” The farmer said, “I don’t see that in there.” The company said, “no, but the courts have said that any lease gives the company that right.” The farmer consulted with a lawyer, who told him the big company was right, but that there were some legal arguments to make and he could take the big company to court, but it would cost $10,000.

Back in 1892 when the first farmer signed the lease, he didn’t expect a well pad, road, and pipeline to take up 15 acres of his good farmland. A well pad took up maybe an acre, and the access road was usually nothing more than a jeep trail.  The pipeline was usually just a couple inches in diameter, and was sometimes laid on the surface over rough ground. He had no way of foreseeing the size and extent of modern well sites. If he could have seen into the future, he probably would have made some changes to the lease before he signed it.

That’s just one example of how a lease surviving for decades could be detrimental to those who inherit it, or those who inherit the property affected by it.

It’s impossible to foresee every possible way that a lease could affect people in the future. You can’t protect your heirs from everything. It is possible, however, to do the best that you can with the information that is out there now.

Multiple formations mean that oil and gas companies could produce one formation until it is exhausted, then a second formation until it is exhausted, and then a third and maybe even a fourth. It’s impossible to tell for sure how many producible formations are down there.  It’s impossible to tell how long the lease will stay alive.

The reason we’re pointing this out right now is that Rex Energy has completed wells to the Marcellus and the Upper Devonian on the same property in Pennsylvania. The Marcellus produced reasonably well, but the Upper Devonian actually produced a little better.  It’s been questionable up until now whether the Upper Devonian would be a good formation to explore.  That question is now laid to rest, at least to some extent.  Wet-Dry_Line_with_Depth

For our West Virginia mineral owners, keep an eye out for leases that include the Upper Devonian.  We can look forward to increased exploration in the usual counties; Tyler, Wetzel, Marshall, Doddridge, Harrison, Ritchie.  There may be a renewed interest in Barbour, Upshur, Taylor, and some of the other counties in the Marcellus dry gas area.  We hope so, as we have clients who are waiting on leases in those counties.

For everyone that’s thinking about signing a lease — do try to think about the future as much as you can.  If you need some help, give us a call.

Nuisance Lawsuits in West Virginia

Frack Truck Country Road

 

 

 

 

 

West Virginia Public Broadcasting did a short segment on what it’s like to live next to Marcellus Shale drilling and production activities.  It’s not real pretty.  While I’m all for oil and gas development here in West Virginia, I also think that the oil and gas companies should really go a little more out of their way to allow the neighbors to maintain their standard of living.  That standard of living isn’t usually extravagant, but it’s often comfortable, quiet, and chosen.  It’s Wild and Wonderful West Virginia.

The people that the oil and gas company contract with usually get enough to make up for the disruption in lifestyle.  It’s the neighbors who don’t have anything the company wants that get the short end of the deal.  They put up with big trucks on little roads, gigantic potholes made by those trucks, noise and light from the drilling rig, the intense rumble of gas being flared off the well when it’s first brought in, and the dust, smoke, and gas from the trucks, rigs, pipelines, and machinery necessary to process the gas.  The companies don’t usually do anything about it.  People can call and complain all they want, but it won’t usually do a lick of good.  The neighbors don’t have any way of forcing the companies to make up for the disruption to their lifestyle, and the change in their environment, other than to file suits.

The article states that over 100 people filed nuisance lawsuits in West Virginia last year against oil and gas production companies of various sorts.  50 of those suits were compiled into a mass litigation suit.  Dave McMahon of WVSORO fame noted in the article that there would probably be a lot more of these kinds of suits if there was more money involved.  It’s hard for an attorney to take on a nuisance case because there’s often not much of a payday in it.

I’d like to see the companies take more initiative to clean things up.  I’ll give them credit, they mostly do a pretty decent job of restoring their well sites to previous contours and otherwise abiding by state regulations.  It’s just not enough.  The companies are affecting peoples’ lives, making it impossible (not just hard) to live the way they did before the gas wells and pipelines came around.  It’s not fair or right that the companies can affect West Virginians’ property and lifestyle without compensating for it.

Perhaps we need a law that allows for double or triple damages in a nuisance lawsuit involving corporations.  Or perhaps we need larger setbacks for certain processing facilities and well pads.  We certainly need better regulations on trucks and roads.  Whatever we do, it should be done soon, before we drive more people out of West Virginia and before the natural gas boom dies off completely.

Frack Water Found in Water Wells! But it’s not as Bad as it Sounds.

Blowback Water Impoundment

A Penn State study from a few years ago has found its way into the news.  Marcellus Drilling News has posted an article here.  If you have trouble viewing the article through that link, do a Google search for “Penn State Finds Chemical Migration in 3 PA Water Wells from 2010”.  MDN links to a bunch of the articles that have been published about the study.

The gist of the articles you will find at most news sources right now is that frack water is bad, and was found in three water wells, so fracking must be bad.

The reality is that the researchers thought the frack water had come from a bad casing job in the vertical portion of the well (the part that is not fracked) or from a frack water containment pit on the surface that was shown to be leaking.  It is splitting hairs to say that fracking is not the cause as it was a fracked well that was the cause, but the reality is that the actual fracking was not the cause.  If one reads far enough into most of the articles at most of the news sites one will find that they all point to something other than the actual fracking being the cause.

I can guarantee that fracked wells communicate with other wells in the area, pushing gas through naturally-occurring weaknesses in the formations between them, and probably pushing some frack fluid through, too.  It’s quite possible that fracked wells communicate with water wells and the surface.  There is not solid evidence yet that that’s the case.

Evidence of communication with the surface and with water wells has probably been covered up by oil and gas companies.  Affected landowners have most likely been given excellent settlements with confidentiality agreements attached.  If I were an oil and gas attorney working for one of the development companies, that’s what I would try to do.  One of these days a surface owner is not going to take the settlement, a case will go to court, and then we’ll all have the evidence at our fingertips.  Until then, it’s all just “he said, she said” and hearsay.  If anyone out there has hard evidence to the contrary, please give this office a call.

Independent Water Testing Before Fracking

Something I always tell surface owners to do is get their water tested.  I’ve never considered getting the air tested, as I’ve never thought that would be a long term problem.  After all, once drilling is done any air pollution will go away with the rig.  Air pollution from the well or pipelines shouldn’t be a problem, and if it is, it will have a pretty obvious source, such as a hissing crack in a pipe.  Apparently, though, air pollution is a concern.

Two Columbia University scientists are doing testing at 15 homes near fracking sites Pennsylvania.  They’re taking samples of both water and air.  They are gathering data to “provide an objective viewpoint to drive a more rational discussion.”  I’ll be very interested to see what their results are.